Friday, October 25, 2013

An Ideal Performance


Last weekend I had the wonderful blessing of getting to visit my sister at college.  She is a theatre major at Azusa Pacific University, and was stage managing one of the shows for the department this semester.  That show was Oscar Wilde’s comedic play An Ideal Husband.  I was able to see the show multiple times while I was down to visit for the weekend, and I can honestly say, it was the highlight of my autumn, so I have decided to dedicate this post to all things Ideal Husband, beginning with a summary of the show (for those of you who, like me two weeks ago, had never heard of the play), following with a review of the APU show, and ending with a bit of a feminist analysis.  So sit back, curl up with a cat, a cup of tea, and a copy of Oscar Wilde’s An Ideal Husband, and enjoy.

After I got home, I was trying to summarize An Ideal Husband for a friend, and the process took me a half an hour, so bear with me as I try to reduce the brilliance of a three hour performance to a couple of paragraphs.

The story is set in the late Victorian period, and follows the three day history of Sir Robert Chiltern and his wife, Lady Gertrude Chiltern.  Sir Robert is a member of the house of Commons and a rising star in the political arena, renowned for his upstanding character.  One evening, during a society party, Sir Robert is confronted by Mrs. Cheveley, a woman of questionable reputation and nefarious intent, who blackmails Sir Robert for his support in an unscrupulous political scheme.  Mrs. Cheveley reveals that she has a letter that Sir Robert wrote when he was young, selling a government secret to a stock investor, an action that was the root of his immense fortune.  Sir Robert reluctantly agrees to help Mrs. Cheveley, however, his wife, a woman of upstanding moral character, not knowing the dark secret of her husband’s past, forces him to withdraw his consent.  Sir Robert, not knowing how best to proceed, explains the entire situation to his best friend, Lord Arthur Goring, an apparently shallow society dandy who actually has unexpected depths of insight and intelligence.  Lord Goring tries to convince Robert to tell his wife the whole truth, but Robert is convinced that his wife will never be able to except his past disgrace.  Lord Goring asks Robert’s permission to at least talk to Lady Chiltern and see how she might react to the news.  In this conversation, Lord Goring is unable to convince Lady Chiltern that her husband could ever commit a wicked or misguided action, or that past vices may be forgiven by present virtues, and understanding that Lady Chiltern will eventually have to learn of her husband’s past, Lord Goring informs her that if she should ever want his help she could trust him come to him immediately.  After Lord Goring leaves, Lady Chiltern is visited by Mrs. Markby (a woman renowned for her ability to talk more and say less than anyone), and Mrs. Cheveley, who has come to inquire about a diamond and snake brooch she has lost the night before.  The broach had been found by Mabel Chilton (Sir Robert’s beautiful and thoroughly modern sister) and Lord Goring in the previous scene, but neither had mentioned the incident to Sir Robert or Lady Chilton.  Lady Chilton asks to speak to Mrs. Cheveley alone, and confronts her about her schemes.  Mrs. Cheveley, in outrage at Gertrude Chilton’s attacks on her character, vengefully informs Lady Chilton of her husband’s tainted past.  The first act ends with Lady Chilton confronting her husband for his actions; informing him that she had always held him up as a ideal, and he had disappointed her.  Sir Robert is broken over his wife’s rejection, and angrily points out that no person is perfect, and that wives who make ideals of their husbands are only a cause of suffering in the world when men, because of their fallen nature, cannot live up to their wives expectations.

The second act begins with Lord Goring receiving a letter from Gertrude Chiltern, in which she informs them, “I want you, I trust you, I am coming to you.”  Lord Goring realizes that she has discovered the entire truth and is coming to him for his advice.  As it is late in the evening, he calls his butler to inform him that he will not be receiving anyone except the lady that night.  He is interrupted by a visit from his father, Lord Caversham (or, in the case of the APU version, Lady Caversham).  Lord Caversham informs Lord Goring that it is obligation to get married as soon as possible.  Flustered because of the immanent visit of Gertrude Chiltern, Lord Goring convinces his father to have this conversation in the smoking room, then informs the butler that when a lady comes to call that evening that he should show her into the drawing room.  Lord Goring and Lord Caversham go to the smoking room, then the doorbell rings.  The butler answers, and shows Mrs. Cheveley into the room.  He informs her that Lord Goring was expecting her, and shows her into the drawing room.  While the lamps are being lit, Mrs. Cheveley snoops around the study and discovers lady Chiltern’s letter to Lord Goring, however, the butler returns before she is able to do more than read it.  Lord Goring and Lord Caversham come back into the study, and Lord Goring offers to show his father out.  Unfortunately, he meets Sir Robert Chiltern in the hallway, and is forced to invite him in.  Sir Robert is uncertain what he should do now that his wife has found out the truth, and Lord Goring is anxious because he thinks that Lady Chiltern is waiting in the drawing room.  As Sir Robert begins to outline what he plans to do about the Argentine Canal scheme, a chair falls in the drawing room.  Angry that someone has been listening in on their conversation, Sir Robert asks Lord Goring who was listening.  Lord Goring, still unaware that it is Mrs. Cheveley and not Lady Chiltern in the drawing room, tries to keep Sir Robert from seeing who it is.  Robert barges into the drawing room and sees Mrs. Cheveley.  Lord Goring tries to explain (still thinking that it is Lady Chiltern), that she came to help him, and that she is utterly blameless in the affair.  Sir Robert is affronted by the fact that Lord Goring is defending his enemy, and leaves in a huff.  Mrs. Cheveley finally emerges from the drawing room, and Lord Goring recognizes what has happened.  Mrs. Cheveley informs Lord Goring that she has come to make him an offer.  She will give him Robert Chiltern’s letter, which is the only evidence of his scandalous past, if Lord Goring, with whom she had had a previous romance, was willing to marry her.  Lord Goring, whose heart had been broken in the previous encounter, steadily refuses all her advances, accusing Mrs. Cheveley of deliberately sabotaging Sir Robert and Lady Chiltern’s relationship.  Mrs. Cheveley feels unjustly accused by the insinuation, and informs Lord Goring that she had gone to the Chilton’s house to inquire about the diamond snake brooch that she had lost.  Lord Goring is elated to discover who had lost the brooch and pulls it out of a drawer.  He unwinds the snake figure, and clasps it on Mrs. Cheveley’s arm as a bracelet.  He then informs her that he had recognized the brooch when he found it, because he had given the brooch as a gift to his cousin, and that the brooch had been stolen.  Mrs. Cheveley desperately tries to deny the situation, but the bracelet will not come off, and she cannot find the clasp.  Lord Goring informs her that he will not call the police and have her arrested for theft if she will give him Robert Chiltern’s letter.  She reluctantly does so, then secretly steals Gertrude Chiltern’s letter off his desk.  He unclasps the bracelet from her arm.  As she is about to leave, Mrs. Cheveley informs Lord Goring that she has stolen Gertrude Chiltern’s “love letter” and that she intends to send it to Robert Chiltern that he might know his wife was unfaithful.  She escapes before Lord Goring can stop her. 

The next morning, Lord Goring immediately goes to visit the Chiltern’s to inform Gertrude that the letter was stolen.  Gertrude has not yet come down, and instead, Lord Goring finds himself accosted by first his father, who is still pushing Lord Goring to get married, and by Mabel Chiltern, who is extremely upset that Lord Goring had missed his appointment to ride with her in the park that morning.  In a momentary impulse, Lord Goring proposes to Mabel, and she accepts delightedly.  Lady Gertrude comes in at that point, and Lord Goring informs her that Robert’s letter has been destroyed, but that her letter has been stolen and Mrs. Cheveley proposes to send it to Robert so that he might think she was having an affair.  Gertrude is unwilling to tell her husband the truth, and instead, tries to have the letter intercepted before it can reach him.  It is too late, however, and Robert has already seen the letter, however, since it was not addressed, he assumes the letter is for him, joyfully reuniting with his wife.  To please Lady Chiltern, Robert decides to give up public life and his career in the Parliament.  At that moment, Lord Caversham comes in and informs Robert that the Prime Minister has granted Robert a seat in his cabinet.  Robert reluctantly refuses in order to please his wife.  Lord Goring takes Gertrude aside and asks her why she is forcing her husband to sacrifice his ambition for her.  Gertrude tells Robert to take the seat in the cabinet, and then Lord Goring asks Robert for permission to marry Mabel.  Robert is at first reluctant because of his belief that Lord Goring still loves and admires Mrs. Cheveley, a misunderstanding due to his discovery of her at Lord Goring’s house the night before.  Gertrude Chiltern informs her husband that it was actually her that Lord Goring was expecting, and that she had written him a letter asking for his help.  With the entire truth known to all parties, Robert finally agrees to let Lord Goring marry Mabel, an announcement that is greeted with great joy by Lord Goring’s father.

That is the best summary I can hope to achieve.  Please realize that the brilliance of the play is in the sparkling dialog and in the interactions between the characters, which no amount of summary can hope to justify.  My only advice is to read, or better yet, to watch the play.  That is the best way to experience the story and understand the comedy of the situation.

Having summarized the play, I can come to my main points.  First, I shall address the actual performance that I had the opportunity to see at APU.  I always struggle in my reviews of amateur shows because there is the constant tension between the magic of the theatre, with the forced suspension of disbelief, and the quality of performance, which can sometimes be an issue in amateur productions.  Fortunately, I can offer little more than complements to the cast and crew of An Ideal Husband on that score.  Stage, props, and costumes were put together with a great attention to detail.  I was lucky enough to get to see one of the shows from backstage, and the amount of attention, the precision of service offered by the entire crew was incredible.  Every piece of furniture, every piece of scenery, every prop was placed to maximize efficiency and performance.  As for the performers, every single one of them did a fantastic job.  There were a couple moments at the beginning of the show where the accents the actors were using would come and go, but as soon as they got into their performance the struggle went away and each individual became the character.  Some standout performances included Emily Dodson as Lady Caversham, Calli Mclellan as Lady Markby, Renna Nightingale as Mrs. Cheveley, and Denver Danyla as Lord Arthur Goring.  Ms. Dodson’s performance was both humorous and heartfelt as she played Lord Goring’s politically motivated, somewhat overbearing mother. Ms. McLellan was likewise hilarious as the loquacious and frivolous Mrs. Markby; playing the part with utter abandon and a great sense of the absurdity of “society” life.  Her performance brought down the house for every show.  Renna Nightingale brought an interesting sense of innocence to the scheming Mrs. Cheveley in a nuanced performance that revealed a hesitant, uncertain center to the manipulative, ambitious woman.  Particularly moving was her performance in the third scene, where her interactions with Denver Danyla’s Lord Goring walked the fine line between humor and drama, as their take of former love and present ambition played itself out with a brilliant poignancy.  It was Mr. Danyla’s portrayal that I found truly remarkable, however.  He was able to balance the frivolity inherent in Lord Goring’s character with a sense of insight and depth of character.  It was easy to imagine the other characters in the play seeking him out for advice, while at the same time conceding vices of vanity and self-interest. 

Because An Ideal Husband was such a small cast, I will take a couple more minutes to praise the rest of the actors, because they all did such a fine job.  Scott Kuiper did an excellent job as Sir Robert Chiltern, particularly at the end of the second scene in his confrontation with Lady Chiltern (played by the lovely Sarah Byrne), where his anguish at his wife’s rejection is mirrored in her distress at her husband’s fall from virtue.  Morgan Reynolds was eminently loveable as Mabel Chiltern, and very deliberately played the character in a forward and almost jealous manner that emphasized her modernity in contrast with the demure manipulations of the other female characters.  Francesca Fromang and Zenna Hodge played off each as both servants and as upper class women attending the party in the first scene.  Their sense of comedic timing was spot on, and their interactions with each other and the surrounding characters was used to great effect.  Last, but certainly not least, was Joseph Reyes in the dual roles of the Vicomte De Nanjac and Phipps the butler.  Mr. Reyes seemed to enjoy himself immensely as the flirtatious Vicomte, but it was in the role of Phipps here he was truly able to shine, bringing to the role the dry humor and sense of absurdity that is so critical in the portrayal of the British manservant.

In coming into the play, director Erin Gaw attempted to emphasize the “joy that comes from being a real person rather than an ideal.”  This is a theme that has particular importance in a Christian setting such as APU, where students are expected to live according to a certain code of conduct and maintain a certain façade in the face of their professors and peers.  There is always a temptation to become an image of respectability rather than living as a real person, and the cast of An Ideal Husband did a fantastic job demonstrating the value of seeing people as people rather then as symbols or ideals.  It is only when Gertrude Chiltern recognizes her husband as a man; not an ideal of upright moral character, nor a depraved villain tainted by a past secret, that she is able to treat him well and love him without condition.  In contrast, Robert’s love for Gertrude is still limited to his ideal of her; he is so utterly convinced that she could never do something wrong, that he is willing to sacrifice his own ambitions and desires because she will admire him for it, and for this reason, continues to doubt her love for him and reduce her affection to mere pity.  This is contrasted to the relationship of Lord Goring and Mabel Chiltern.  Mabel’s affection for Arthur Goring is based on a full understanding of him as a man; his faults, his ambitions, and his virtues.  She knows that she cannot view him as an ideal husband, which leaves him free to be whatever sort of man he wants to be, while she is determined not to be an ideal for him, but to simply be a “real wife to him.”  The greatest love is not found in ignoring or denying the faults in another person as Robert and Gertrude Chiltern do, but in acknowledging the other as a person, and treating them as real, flawed, but beautiful individuals,  An ideal is set up to be selfishly worshiped, while true love is a giving of oneself to another person without reservations.

The tendency to make an ideal of another person lends itself to another theme in An Ideal Husband, that of the roles of men and women.  In this aspect, An Ideal Husband is very much a product of its time, although certain portrayals can mitigate the negative vision of women.  The men portrayed in the show are very mixed characters.  They each have flaws and virtues; and it is only when the women are able to recognize both aspects in their husbands that they are able to truly love them.  The women, on the other hand, fall into the classic Madonna/whore dichotomy: they are either perfectly virtuous or they are utterly corrupt.  From the frivolous characters like Mrs. Marchmont and the Countess of Basildon to the intelligent and manipulative Mrs. Cheveley, the villainous women are defined by their disregard for their husbands and their flirtations.  In stark contrast are the heroines of the play; Gertrude Chiltern is lauded by her husband as being a woman of utter perfection, and her only flaw is her expectation for her husband to be as “virtuous” as she are.  She need only learn grace for her husband’s flaw to meet the “ideal” of a wife that Oscar Wilde is setting up.  Likewise, Mabel Chiltern displays no obvious faults either: her vivacious personality does not hide a deficiency of intelligence, nor is her assertion that she “has no character left” off-putting to Lord/Lady Caversham, who is charmed at the idea of having such a lovely lady as a daughter in law.  Both Mabel and Gertrude represent the ideal of a pure wife who utterly adores her husband despite his flaws.  Lord Goring sums up this attitude toward women, “If we men married the women we deserved, we should have a very bad time of it.”  The tendency to place women upon a pedestal above the men they marry reduces them to a symbol, not a real person at all.  As this ideal, the women are also called to sacrifice of themselves of the sake of their husbands.  Consider the final act. Gertrude Chiltern is thrilled by the proposition of her husband retiring from public life and the two of them moving to the country for a life of seclusion with each other.  Her desires, however, must be s to her husband’s ambition because his love for her would not survive the sacrifice of his ambition.  Instead, Gertrude is required to sacrifice what she wants, and is expected to rejoice in her husband’s success.  While men should not be expected to make sacrifices to the idol of their ideal wife, the woman, out of her virtue should be willing to sacrifice herself on the altar of her husband’s ambition.

It is not just the portrayal of women as either entirely corrupt or virtuous characters that is degrading to the gender.  The very dialog emphasizes the relative lack of seriousness inherent to women, and the frivolity of female conversation.  Mrs. Cheveley, arguably the most powerful female character in the play, demonstrates this deficiency of dialog.  In the third act, Cheveley discusses with Lord Goring a proposition in which she will give him Robert Chiltern’s letter in exchange for his hand in marriage.  In what is presumably a “business” conversation, however, romantic, Mrs. Cheveley is constantly being distracted in her statement, bouncing from the conversation of the Irish to the size of Gertrude Chiltern’s gloves, to the value of an English country house, and back again.  While Lord Goring consistently brings the topic back to the pertinent issue, Mrs. Cheveley flits through the conversation like a butterfly, landing for a brief moment before flying on to something else.  A similar pattern is displayed in the second act, were the conversation of Lord Goring and Sir Robert Chiltern is contrasted with that of his wife, Mrs. Cheveley, and Lady Markby; the one utterly businesslike, confronting the issue and driving the plot forward, while the other is marked by frivolous, if humorous gossip and pointless chatter.  Indeed, Mrs. Cheveley comments on the situation, “Wonderful woman, Lady Markby, isn’t she.  Talks more and says less than anybody I ever met.”  This is the consistent state of women in An Ideal Husband, consistently talking and saying very little; dancing around the subject instead of coming out and saying what they mean in a strictly honest fashion.  This aspect of the dialog emphasizes the distance between men and women, and places in the position of superior moral character but inferior intelligence to the men in the story.

The production at APU was able to offset some of these deficiencies in an unexpected way.  Due to the shortage of men auditioning for the show, they made the decision to change Lord Caversham to a female role.  This utterly changes the position of women in the play.  Lord Caversham is a deeply political figure; a bit of an eccentric, but eminently capable in the public realm; well informed and intelligent.  By changing the part to be a woman, the show gave a new voice to the female characters; here is a woman capable of acting in a political way without the underhanded manipulation used by Mrs. Cheveley, a lady capable of conversation without the gossip and frivolity expected of the sex, a woman who swears, visits the prime minister, and is perfectly honest about every person to whom she speaks.  At the same time, Ms. Emily Dodson was able to bring a decidedly female sense to the role: fussing over Lord Goring and demanding a deciding voice in the matter of his romantic life.  By the positioning of such a powerful female character, the APU cast was able to present version of the play, that, while still subject to the flaws of the text, was able to present a humorous and insightful show that was not as negative toward women as it might have been.

The presentation of An Ideal Husband that APU put on was both thoroughly enjoyable and thought provoking.  The portrayal of women in the original text was troubling, but was saved in part by the decision to cast a Lady Caversham instead of a Lord.  The entire cast did a phenomenal job, and the result was a show of sparkling wit and deep emotion, a show that kept me coming back for more, and inspired me to read more by Oscar Wilde.  While every interpretation of the show is going to be different, I certainly recommend finding and viewing An Ideal Husband, and if you had the privilege, as I did, to see the show at APU, I congratulate you.  I look forward to seeing what this talented group of students will do in the future, both at APU and in their individual careers.